There are plenty of pejoratives you can hurl at the Oscars self-important, overlong, old-fashioned, out-of-touch but in recent years, you cant complain that theyve lacked for drama. With the adoption of the preferential ballot in 2009, which asks Academy members to vote for Best Picture with a ranked list, the shows biggest prize has become far more suspenseful, resulting in several splits between Director and Picture, and a few outright upsets, with Spotlight besting The Revenant and, memorably, Moonlight triumphing over La La Land. Last year, The Shape of Water, Get Out and Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri were all strong contenders, and this Sundays ceremony again features several films with decent odds of walking away with the Academy Award.
That suspense has helped squash memories of bygone Oscar ceremonies in which towering front-runners such as Titanic or The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King turned the night into dull, lumbering coronations. Frankly, its boring to know at the start of the show whats going to win, so the possibility of a surprise title being read for Best Picture for instance, a Shakespeare in Love shocking the favored Saving Private Ryan always gives the evening a surge of electricity.
The Quiet Defiance of Mahershala AliOscars 2019: Breaking Down the Nominations, or This Is Why We Can't Have Nice ThingsJohn Frusciante: Eight Great Moments With Red Hot Chili PeppersPhil Anselmo Remembers Dimebag Darrell: 'I Think of Him Every Day'
But if this years Oscars comes with plenty of anticipation and were not even talking about how the show will work without a host theres also some dread. Several films could go home with the top prize, but one choice among the pack would be particularly galling. This movies chances seemed remote a few months ago, but its now primed to pull off a possible upset, much to the chagrin of those whose despise the film and what it represents.
Seriously, what happens if Green Book wins?
Its worth acknowledging that many people enjoyed this crowd-pleasing comedy-drama inspired by a true friendship, as the posters say about the bond that developed in the early 1960s between white, racist New York bouncer Tony Lip Vallelonga (Viggo Mortensen) and black, gay pianist Don Shirley (Mahershala Ali) during a car trip through the South. Green Book has landed on myriad Top 10 lists, including that ofRolling Stones own Peter Travers, who praised the acting duos flat-out fantastic performances. The film won the prestigious Producers Guild Award and the Toronto Film Festivals Peoples Choice Award, two potent Oscar bellwethers. And Steven Spielberg reportedly called it his favorite buddy movie since Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.
Directed with affection by Peter Farrelly,Green Book speaks to our national divisions and how they might be healed. But its possible triumph at Sundays Academy Awards isnt a feel-good story akin to the one Farrelly and his capable cast peddle within the movie. The reason so many fans and critics alike fear Green Books victory is that it would highlight the discouraging, lingering fustiness of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the folks who decide each year what films and performances are best. No large voting bloc is perfect or uniform. (Hey, a majority of us didnt vote for Trump, but were stuck with him anyway.) But for those who believe the Oscars matter that they help to create an official-ish canon of indelible cinematic work the momentum behindGreen Book feels like the groups fuddy-duddy tendencies coming back with a vengeance. We wanted to believe that Best Picture wins for patronizing depictions of race relations such asDriving Miss Daisy and Crash were a thing of the past. On Sunday, that happy illusion may be shattered.
To be clear, those previous winners (and Green Book) arent inherently evil. Each in its own way is advocating finding common cause with others not of the same race, recognizing that there is more that unites us than divides us. In a Trump era where prejudice is a political strategy and white nationalism is treated as one side of a debate, Green Book preaches hope and tolerance. But unlike Spike Lees BlacKkKlansman the Do the Right Thing to Green Books Driving Miss Daisy which prefers militant resistance and a skeptical outlook, Farrellys film views social ills as eminently curable, tidily resolving its tensions rather than giving them back to the audience to further ponder their complexities.
No one should question Farrellys honorable intentions, but Green Book nonetheless continues a frustrating, persistent habit of white filmmakers attempting to depict American racism, often from the perspective of an unaffected white protagonist. Tony Lip is Green Books main character, just as Jessica Tandys Daisy is the lead in Driving Miss Daisy. Even if theyre not those films saviors, per se, we learn about bigotry through their eyes its something they come to realize is a scourge, as opposed to their African-American cohorts, who have to endure it. Whether in these movies or other award-winners such as Glory, The Blind Side or The Help, a distressing, recurring Oscar trend continues apace, which is that the Academy prefers these stories of racial healing told from a safe, white distance.
There was optimism that this trend might be ending. Thanks to the #OscarsSoWhite controversy, the Academy was shamed for (or, put more charitably, made aware of) its racial blind spots. In 2012, the Los Angeles Times reported that, out of approximately 5,800 Academy voters, more than 93 percent were white and more than three-fourths male. The result: Academy president Cheryl Boone Isaacs took action, spearheading an initiative to invite new members, which aimed to double the number of women and people of color in the organization by 2020. (And if that helped make the membership a little younger, too, no one would complain: In 2013, the Los Angeles Times revealed the groups average age was 63.)
At first, that initiative (consciously or not) seemed to be impacting the Oscars. At the 2014 ceremony, the wrenching slavery drama 12 Years a Slave, written and directed by black filmmakers and featuring a black protagonist, won Best Picture. Three years later, Moonlight, the story of a gay, black Florida youth, told by a black director and black co-writer, bested La La Land, a film that felt demonstrably white and sanitized by comparison. (The fact that Ryan Goslings character constantly declared his love for jazz didnt help.) And this years Oscars are pleasingly diverse, with Black Panther, BlacKkKlansman and Roma set and made in Mexico with an all-Mexican cast all up for Best Picture. So, thats progress, right?
Maybe, but societies have a dispiriting tendency of moving two steps forward and then taking one large step back. And the Academys past gaffes still haunt it. For years, Driving Miss Daisys win was held up as an example of how the Oscars are tone-deaf, the voters virtually ignoring the groundbreaking Do the Right Thing while celebrating an anodyne trifle. The infusion of more diverse voices within the Academy was meant to ensure such an embarrassment didnt happen ever again. Green Books potential victory would argue that the Academy still has a long way to go.
Sure, there are several simplistic assumptions at work in that statement including, most crucially, that all black Academy members automatically hate Green Book. (Keep in mind that Oscar-winning actress Octavia Spencer is one of the films executive producers.) But during a troubling period in which the Academy has seemed unsure of itself, floating the terrible idea of creating a Best Popular Movie category and seriously considering not airing all of its awards live, a Green Book win underscores the organizations general malaise especially when a far more adventurous, artistic and deserving film is right there ready to be picked this year.
Roma, a meditative deep-dive into the life of a Mexican family in the early 1970s, would be the first foreign-language entry to ever win Best Picture. Some have groused about filmmaker Alfonso Cuarns telling the story of a female maid, questioning his right to a womans narrative. Nonetheless, Roma offers a wider perspective on the world than the blinkered Academy usually embraces, and recent wins for 12 Years a Slave and Moonlight gave hope that the voters werent afraid to honor diversity while at the same time celebrating singular films. (And thats to say nothing of the recent Oscar track record of the so-called Three Amigos the trailblazing Mexican filmmakers Cuarn, Alejandro G. Irritu and Guillermo del Toro who have won four of the last five Best Director prizes, which could very easily become five out of six if Cuarn, as expected, takes the trophy for Roma.)
If Green Book wins Best Picture, it wont be the end of the world. We all know that the Academy has a history of terrible picks. But that doesnt mean the Oscar membership needs to add to that woeful history. In a year where the voters seemed more willing than ever to recognize the finest in film no matter who made it or where it originated Green Book feels like the kind of outwardly safe choice that represents an old way of thinking, a mindset the Academy leadership has tried to combat with its diversity outreach. Yes, no large voting bloc is perfect or uniform and its unfair to paint with too broad a brush when discussing the Academys disparate members. But if the bulk of them think Green Book is the most vibrant or challenging work that their art form produced in 2018, its more than fair to question their judgment. And their taste.
Posting Komentar
Posting Komentar